🚢 🚢 🚢
Seal
«It'll be some Shots Fired tonight»
·

«It'll be some Shots Fired tonight»

The third assassination attempt on Trump, a Teacher of the Month with a shotgun, and a very convenient coincidence with the ballroom lawsuit.

«It’ll be some Shots Fired tonight»

That’s what Donnie J. Trump announced today. Well… he wasn’t wrong.

April 25, 2026, ~8:35 PM ET. The White House Correspondents’ Dinner, Washington Hilton. Journalists, officials, tuxedos — and a man with a shotgun, a handgun, and knives. The third assassination attempt on Donald Trump since 2024.

The suspect — Cole Tomas Allen, 31, from Torrance, California — was detained after opening fire near the security checkpoint. According to Reuters, he fired a shotgun at a Secret Service agent before being quickly subdued.

According to current reports, the attacker checked into the Washington Hilton on Friday — the day before the dinner, as a regular hotel guest. The hotel lobby remains open to guests during WHCD — standard practice. The main security checkpoint with metal detectors was positioned not at the hotel entrance, but closer to the ballroom. Footage shows that officers were in the process of dismantling the metal detectors — Trump was already seated in the ballroom, the entrance was closed, so they had started packing up. Allen exploited exactly that window. According to the Washington Post, he ran approximately 60 feet past the checkpoint and reached the top of the staircase leading to the ballroom doors.

But let’s set that aside. The real question is: how was this allowed to happen? Trump is no idiot, and neither is his security detail. They clearly knew something like this could occur. Would they really gamble with the president’s life? I don’t buy it.

The question isn’t whether anyone was in danger — it’s how he got in there in the first place. What if the attacker had been a decent shot? Did they just miss him? Too many coincidences.

Two scenarios:

1) The shooter was working with someone inside the hotel or security. This wasn’t spontaneous — which is likely the primary theory investigators are pursuing.

2) The conspiracy version.

And here’s where it gets interesting.

Trump has been locked in a legal battle over the construction of a new ballroom on White House grounds for a while now. The project is controversial: critics cite procedural violations, destruction of a historic part of the complex, and bypassing normal approval processes. The litigation has dragged on for months. An appeals court allowed construction to continue temporarily — with the next hearing set for June 5.

And then — an almost cinematic coincidence.

The WHCD isn’t just journalists. It’s the president, the first lady, the vice president, cabinet members, intelligence chiefs, diplomats. Any threat there automatically becomes a matter of national security. Allen did try to breach the ballroom, was armed, wounded a Secret Service agent — and was stopped before reaching the ballroom.

And immediately after, Trump makes exactly the political move he needed: linking the attack to the country’s supposed long-standing need for a secure ballroom right on White House grounds.

Trump's Truth Social post about the ballroom

Washington Post, Fortune and Washington Examiner all report directly: Trump used the incident as an argument for his construction project.

A coincidence? I don’t think so. Too convenient.

Before June 5, political pressure needs to be built. Anyone who opposes the project — any judge, any critic, any plaintiff — must be made to look not like a defender of historic heritage, but like someone standing in the way of presidential security.

I lean toward the second version. I don’t believe in coincidences.

And the conclusion, as always, is one: Absolut Democracy.

© Seal